More Than Just Parks
AdvocacyOppose
Wilderness designation
Wilderness protection
Wilderness stewardship policy
NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice
NPS-2026-0100-0001Notice
Comments
219
Last activity Aug 4, 2026
Deadline
6 days
Closes Aug 15, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-64%
-64% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice
- Posted
- Jun 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 15, 2026 – Aug 15, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11958
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 213 of 219 comments
97%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
-64%
Net support
Support37Oppose174Other2Not yet analyzed6
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -64% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
209
Advocacy
4
Not yet analyzed
6
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jun 15, 2026Deadline Aug 15, 2026
Jun 15Jun 29Jul 13Jul 27Aug 3
Support37Oppose174Other2
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
18%
82%
0%
Advocacy
0%
75%
25%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Wilderness designation | Wilderness protection | Wilderness stewardship policy |
|---|---|---|---|
More Than Just Parks AdvocacyOppose Jim Pattiz, representing More Than Just Parks, opposes the review of Director's Order #41, arguing that it could weaken |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.