Citizens' Advisory Commission on Federal Areas
AdvocacyOppose
Daily permit limits
Environmental protection
Vehicle Use: Denali National Park and Preserve
NPS-2026-0067-0001NPRM
Comments
62
Last activity Jul 17, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 18, 2026
Closed Jul 18, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-40%
-40% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Vehicle Use: Denali National Park and Preserve
- Posted
- May 18, 2026
- Comment period
- May 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09876
- CFR
- 36 CFR Part 13
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-40%
Net support
Support18Oppose43Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -40% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
1
Government
1
Individual
52
Advocacy
4
Trade association
1
Other
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 18, 2026Deadline Jul 18, 2026
May 18Jun 1Jun 15Jun 29Jul 13
Support18Oppose43Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
23%
75%
2%
Advocacy
50%
50%
0%
Other
67%
33%
0%
Business
100%
0%
0%
Government
0%
100%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Daily permit limits | Environmental protection | Opposition to increased vehicle limits | Alaska resident permit quota |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Citizens' Advisory Commission on Federal Areas AdvocacyOppose The Citizens' Advisory Commission on Alaska Federal Areas (CACAFA) opposes the proposed rule to codify a permanent daily | · | · | ||
Denali Citizens Council AdvocacySupport The Denali Citizens Council supports the goal of codifying a vehicle limit for the Denali Park Road but argues that the | · | |||
Main Street Foundation Center for Regulatory Analysis and Engagement AdvocacySupport The Main Street Foundation's Center for Regulatory Analysis and Engagement (CRAE) supports the proposed rule to moderniz | · | · | · | |
State of Alaska GovernmentOppose The State of Alaska opposes the proposed rule because it lacks updated scientific justification for the 160-vehicle dail | · |
Denali Citizens Council
AdvocacySupport
Daily permit limits
Environmental protection
Opposition to increased vehicle limits
Main Street Foundation Center for Regulatory Analysis and Engagement
AdvocacySupport
Daily permit limits
State of Alaska
GovernmentOppose
Daily permit limits
Opposition to increased vehicle limits
Alaska resident permit quota
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 17, 2026Comment from State of AlaskaOpposeGovernment📎 Attachment
The State of Alaska opposes the proposed rule because it lacks updated scientific justification for the 160-vehicle daily limit, risks violating statutory access rights for inholders and subsistence users under ANILCA, and creates a rigid cap that could stifle economic growth. The State requests that the rule be replaced with an adaptive management framework that exempts inholder and subsistence access from vehicle caps and allows for future flexibility.
Read comment → - May 18, 2026Johnny MurdockSupportIndividualRead comment →