Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of America, and South Atlantic: Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of America; Amendment 19

An individual is opposing the proposed action on the grounds of animal welfare, arguing that fishing causes unnecessary pain and cruelty to fish and crustaceans. They advocate for the protection of marine life and the cessation of fishing activities.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that the current regulations are shutting down the domestic shrimp industry, causing financial hardship, and increasing paperwork. They suggest that if the permit is allowed to lapse, the government should buy back existing permits, or if renewed, the number of permits in circulation should be capped to allow for new market entry.

The commenter, identifying as an interested individual, provides a technical comment regarding the proposed modifications to catch limits and accountability measures. They express a neutral stance, requesting greater clarity on the methodology and highlighting the need for stakeholders to consider potential impacts on operational flexibility and long-term yields.

A private individual who grew up on the Gulf Coast supports the renewal of Amendment 19. They argue that the regulation is necessary to prevent under-shrimping and over-shrimping, and that the amendment has been effective in protecting ocean life.