North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Strike Reduction Rule
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Strike Reduction Rule
- Posted
- Mar 4, 2026
- Comment period
- Mar 4, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-04260
- CFR
- 50 CFR Part 224
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 11, 2026In Defense of AnimalsOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
In Defense of Animals, an international nonprofit, opposes the proposed deregulatory changes to the North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Speed Rule. They argue that mandatory speed limits are effective at reducing deadly collisions and that replacing them with unproven tracking technologies would prioritize industry convenience over the survival of a critically endangered species.
Read comment → - Jun 10, 2026Email comment_45SupportIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter advocates for maintaining mandatory vessel speed limits to protect the endangered North Atlantic right whale population. They argue that voluntary guidelines or new technologies should not replace existing 10-knot restrictions, which they view as essential for preventing vessel strikes.
Read comment → - Jun 2, 2026Tricia WehringSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the vessel speed rule for North Atlantic right whales, citing scientific evidence that mandatory speed limits are more effective than voluntary measures or technology alone. They argue that while technology can be a helpful diagnostic aid, it cannot replace enforceable speed restrictions in preventing lethal vessel strikes.
Read comment →
