Endangered and Threatened Species: 12-Month Findings on a Petition to List the Tope Shark and Proposed Listing of Two Distinct Population Segments of Tope Shark
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Endangered and Threatened Species: 12-Month Findings on a Petition to List the Tope Shark and Proposed Listing of Two Distinct Population Segments of Tope Shark
- Posted
- Apr 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 15, 2026 – Jun 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07294
- CFR
- 50 CFR Part 223
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 15, 2026Defend Them All and the Center for Biological DiversitySupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Defend Them All and the Center for Biological Diversity support the proposed threatened listings for two Tope Shark population segments but argue that the proposal is insufficient for the remaining four segments. They urge the NMFS to list the Northeast Pacific DPS as threatened or endangered and to adopt stronger protective regulations, including a similarity-of-appearance rule for lookalike species.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026Abigayl FarrOpposeAcademic📎 Attachment
A graduate student at the University of Washington argues that the agency should list the Northeast Pacific population of tope shark as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The commenter contends that there is insufficient evidence to show the population is increasing and that the lack of baseline data, combined with climate change risks, justifies including this population in the listing.
Read comment →
