Extension and Modification of Limitation on Wagering Losses: Increase in Threshold for Requiring Information Reporting with Respect to Certain Payees
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Extension and Modification of Limitation on Wagering Losses: Increase in Threshold for Requiring Information Reporting with Respect to Certain Payees
- Posted
- Apr 17, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 17, 2026 – Jun 17, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07519
- CFR
- 26 CFR Parts 1 and 31
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Information reporting thresholds | Phantom income | Taxation of losses | Wagering loss deduction limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
House of Representatives GovernmentSupport Representative Dina Titus, via her office, supports the modernization of federal gaming policy, including the updated sl | · | |||
The Cleverley Stone Foundation AdvocacySupport Katie Stone, president of The Cleverley Stone Foundation, supports the proposed regulations but argues for specific modi | · | · | · |
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 23, 2026TAMU (Robert D. Probasco - comment and Request for Hearing)OtherAcademic📎 Attachment
Robert D. Probasco, a faculty member and clinic director at the Texas A&M University School of Law, provides comments regarding the reporting of wagering gains and losses. While he does not explicitly support or oppose the proposed regulations, he suggests specific amendments to allow casinos to report winnings on a per-session basis and provide customers with statements of net winnings or losses by session.
Read comment → - Jun 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual taxpayer expresses confusion regarding the proposed changes and argues that the regulation should instead revert to the pre-OBBBA rules to avoid additional taxes on losses. They also request that taxpayers be allowed to take the standard deduction when reporting gambling income and losses rather than being forced to itemize.
Read comment →
