Excise Tax on Remittance Transfers
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Excise Tax on Remittance Transfers
- Posted
- Apr 13, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 13, 2026 – Jun 13, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07085
- CFR
- 26 CFR Parts 40 and 49
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Provider-level tax adjustment mechanism | Military personnel exemption |
|---|---|---|
America's Credit Unions AdvocacySupport America’s Credit Unions supports the IRS's proposed rules for the excise tax on remittance transfers, particularly the a | · | |
INFiN, A Financial Services Alliance Trade associationSupport INFiN, a national trade association representing financial services providers, supports the federal goal of improving ta | · | |
U.S. Money Express Co. BusinessSupport U.S. | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 12, 2026America's Credit UnionsSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
America’s Credit Unions supports the IRS's proposed rules for the excise tax on remittance transfers, particularly the alignment with existing regulations and the inclusion of traveler's checks as exempt instruments. They request additional clarification regarding the IRS's authority to recharacterize transactions for tax avoidance and the status of foreign military bases.
Read comment → - Apr 13, 2026Alex StinauerOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the proposed remittance transfer tax because it disproportionately affects U.S. military personnel stationed in areas with limited banking infrastructure. They argue that service members are forced to use cash and money orders for necessary expenses and request an explicit exemption for military personnel or transactions in areas without electronic payment access.
Read comment →
