Taxes on Taxable Distributions from Donor Advised Funds under Section 4966
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Taxes on Taxable Distributions from Donor Advised Funds under Section 4966
- Posted
- Nov 14, 2023
- Comment period
- Nov 14, 2023 – Feb 16, 2024
- FR Doc
- 2023-24982
- CFR
- 26 CFR Part 53
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Apr 4, 2024Greater Toledo Community FoundationOtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Greater Toledo Community Foundation is requesting the opportunity to provide in-person testimony at a public hearing regarding proposed regulations on taxes for Donor Advised Funds. The organization intends to discuss the reclassification of funds, the definition of a "distribution," and the effective date of the regulations.
Read comment → - Feb 15, 2024Sedreddine & Whoriskey, LLPOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Sedreddine & Whoriskey, LLP, a law firm representing 501(c)(3) public charities, opposes the proposed regulations because they overly expand the definition of Donor Advised Funds (DAFs). They argue the rules could unnecessarily capture fiscal sponsorships and other restricted funds, which would hinder charitable programming, and they request specific exceptions and a prospective applicability date.
Read comment → - Feb 15, 2024FAOGOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Finance, Administration & Operations Group for Community Foundations (FAOG), representing over 300 community foundations, opposes the proposed regulations due to the administrative burdens and disproportionate impact they would have on community foundations. They argue that the rules would impede philanthropy and volunteer engagement, and they request either a delay in the effective date or a prospective application.
Read comment → - Feb 15, 2024Vanguard CharitableSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Vanguard Charitable, a sponsor of donor-advised funds (DAFs), supports the proposed regulations but requests specific modifications to ensure practical implementation. They advocate for a non-retroactive applicability date, a clearer definition of "distribution" that excludes reasonable DAF-specific administrative expenses, and specific guidance on grant-related expenses and expenditure responsibility.
Read comment → - Feb 14, 2024Marin Community FoundationOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Marin Community Foundation opposes the proposed regulations because they would create significant operational burdens and negative impacts on their personal investment advisor program. They specifically argue against the expanded definition of "donor advisors" to include personal investment advisors and request a transition period to avoid automatic excess benefit transactions.
Read comment → - Feb 13, 2024The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) submitted comments regarding proposed regulations on excise taxes for donor-advised funds (DAFs). While they generally support the regulations' goal of encouraging philanthropy, they recommend several specific modifications to clarify definitions of "distributions," "separately identified" funds, and "advisory privileges" to ensure consistency with existing tax laws and to prevent unintended administrative burdens or penalties on charitable organizations.
Read comment → - Feb 13, 2024The SignatrySupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Servant Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization, supports the proposed regulations but requests specific clarifications and improvements. They argue that reasonable expenses for maintaining donated assets should not be considered taxable distributions and seek explicit guidance that funds established exclusively for a public charity's operating programs are not considered donor-advised funds (DAFs).
Read comment → - Feb 12, 2024Ensemble Capital ManagementOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Ensemble Capital Management, an investment advisory firm, argues that the proposed rules incorrectly categorize investment advisors as "donor-advisors" because they do not hold distribution privileges and are already subject to SEC fiduciary duties. They contend that the new regulations would hinder capital growth for charitable purposes and request a transition period for the rules to take effect.
Read comment → - Feb 9, 2024Venn FoundationOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Venn Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity and DAF sponsoring organization, argues that the proposed rules create confusion by removing established standards for Program-Related Investments (PRIs) and suggests incorporating existing PRI definitions for clarity. They also oppose the proposed retroactive applicability date, requesting a future applicability date and grandfathering provisions to allow for a smooth transition and to preserve existing charitable impacts.
Read comment → - Jun 15, 2026ABA (Megan L. Brackney)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The American Bar Association Section of Taxation is submitting a series of recommendations to be included in the 2026-2027 Priority Guidance Plan. They argue that these specific guidance items will reduce controversy, lessen the burden on taxpayers and the IRS, and promote sound tax administration.
Read comment →
