Endangered and Threatened Species: Designation of Critical Habitat for 22 Species in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the Territory of Guam
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Endangered and Threatened Species: Designation of Critical Habitat for 22 Species in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and the Territory of Guam
- Posted
- Mar 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Mar 24, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-05678
- CFR
- 50 CFR Part 17
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Habitat preservation and restoration | Support for critical habitat designation | Climate change adaptation | Department of defense land exclusions | Impact on property rights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Center for Biological Diversity AdvocacySupport The Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit environmental organization, strongly supports the finalization of the p | · | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 21, 2026Mike GawelSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Mike Gawel, a wildlife ecology researcher with extensive experience in the Pacific Islands, supports the designation of critical habitats but criticizes the Fish and Wildlife Service's procedural approach. He argues that the agency failed to provide adequate time for public review, lacked sufficient coordination with the Department of War, and did not meaningfully engage with local and traditional knowledge holders.
Read comment → - Apr 14, 2026Ashley AlvordSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Ashley Alvord supports the proposed critical habitat designation but urges the Fish and Wildlife Service to minimize exclusions based on speculative economic or national security claims. The commenter argues that the long-term ecological and economic benefits of habitat protection, such as ecosystem services and eco-tourism, outweigh short-term development gains.
Read comment →
