Challenges and Solutions in Lot-Level Food Traceability; Public Meeting and Request for Comments
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Challenges and Solutions in Lot-Level Food Traceability; Public Meeting and Request for Comments
- Posted
- May 28, 2026
- Comment period
- May 28, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10603
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 7, 2026Comment from PTI Leadership Council, RedLine Solutions a 29 yr old Produce Packer, Shipper, Distributor Software CompanyOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
The commenter, representing Fresh Byte, opposes the proposed flexibilities for "reasonable range" and "inferred" traceability lot codes, arguing that these measures undermine the precise traceability goals of FSMA 204 and increase public health risks and civil liabilities. They advocate for scanning every case and utilizing existing software capabilities to maintain accurate lot-level data.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026James ForshaySupportBusiness
James Forshay, an owner-operator of a small fresh-cut produce business, supports maintaining strict lot-level traceability requirements as a means of protecting small businesses from broad, costly recalls. He argues that while flexibility is needed for practical implementation, it should not compromise data precision and suggests providing small operators with plain-language guidance and model records.
Read comment → - Jun 15, 2026Oscar Vargas TorresSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter proposes the development and adoption of a mobile application to support food traceability for agricultural exports from Mexico to the United States. They have already developed a prototype and offer to enhance and scale it to meet the regulatory and operational needs of stakeholders.
Read comment → - Jun 11, 2026Comment from Convenience Distribution Association; Minnesota Wholesale Marketers AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Minnesota Wholesale Marketers Association (MWMA), in conjunction with the Convenience Distribution Association (CDA), argues that the FDA should adopt a flexible option for FSMA Section 204(d) compliance by requiring manufacturers to imprint Traceability Lot Codes (TLC), TLC Sources, and expiration dates directly on case labels, inner packs, and individual packages. They contend that this "imprinting" model is a feasible, long-standing industry practice that avoids forcing distributors, retailers, and restaurants to overhaul their existing business operating systems or software to achieve effective lot-level traceability.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026Comment from Dot Foods, Inc.SupportBusiness
Dot Foods, a large food industry consolidator, supports the use of GS1 Standards to implement the Food Traceability Rule under FSMA Section 204. They argue that standardized data and exchange protocols are essential for ensuring consistency, interoperability, and efficient data sharing across the supply chain.
Read comment → - Jun 6, 2026Comment from Altibbe Inc.SupportAcademic📎 Attachment
Altibbe Inc., an independent research organization, supports the FDA's exploration of pragmatic flexibilities in how lot-level records are formatted and transmitted. However, they urge the FDA to maintain strict requirements on the granularity of the data itself, arguing that any flexibility must allow for the reconstruction of the same lot-to-CTE linkage as full compliance.
Read comment →
