Aviation-Impacted Communities Alliance (AICA)
AdvocacyOther
Clarity of stated functions
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Aircraft Noise Complaint and Inquiry System (Noise Portal)
FAA-2026-0661-0087Notice
Comments
12
Last activity Jun 10, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jun 11, 2026
Closed Jun 11, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+36%
+36% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Aircraft Noise Complaint and Inquiry System (Noise Portal)
- Posted
- May 11, 2026
- Comment period
- May 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09236
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 11 of 12 comments
92%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
+36%
Net support
Support6Oppose2Other3Not yet analyzed1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +36% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
10
Advocacy
1
Not yet analyzed
1
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 11, 2026Deadline Jun 11, 2026
May 25Jun 1Jun 8
Support6Oppose2Other3
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
60%
20%
20%
Advocacy
0%
0%
100%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Clarity of stated functions |
|---|---|
Aviation-Impacted Communities Alliance (AICA) AdvocacyOther The Aviation-Impacted Communities Alliance (AICA) requests that OMB seek clarification from the FAA regarding the discre |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jun 10, 2026Marcia BullardSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the improvements to the FAA's Noise Portal, specifically advocating for the inclusion of modern noise metrics that address public health hazards rather than just "community annoyance." They argue that updating these methodologies aligns with the FAA's own recent findings and would help establish nationwide "Fly Quiet" programs while saving taxpayer funds.
Read comment → - Jun 10, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed improvements to the FAA's Noise Portal, specifically advocating for more modern noise metrics and analytics that correlate with public health hazards rather than outdated "community annoyance" models. They argue that these updates would help community groups establish "Fly Quiet" programs more efficiently and reduce the financial burden on local governments to hire specialized experts.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026S LopezSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the FAA's efforts to improve the Noise Portal, specifically advocating for the inclusion of more modern noise metrics and analytics that align with "Fly Quiet" programs. They argue that updating the methodology to reflect public health concerns rather than outdated "community annoyance" models would benefit community groups and reduce the financial burden on local governments.
Read comment → - Jun 6, 2026Rohit KumarSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the FAA's efforts to improve the Noise Portal, specifically advocating for the inclusion of more modern noise metrics and analytics that align with "Fly Quiet" programs. They argue that updating the methodology to reflect public health hazards rather than just "community annoyance" will help community groups and reduce the need for local government funding of expensive subject matter experts.
Read comment →