Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: Unmanaged Combustion Residual Leachate
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category: Unmanaged Combustion Residual Leachate
Federal Register for Monday, May 18, 2026 (91 FR 28487) [FRL-8794.2-01-OW]
- Posted
- May 18, 2026
- Comment period
- May 18, 2026 – Jun 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09895
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 423
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Coal ash leachate safety | Data center regulation | Oppose deregulation of effluent limits | Procedural and substantive concerns | Public health and water costs |
|---|
33 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 1, 2026Comment submitted by Susan CollinsOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Susan Collins of FWWatch opposes the proposed action, arguing that the coal industry is a primary driver of the climate crisis. She advocates for closing coal and natural gas plants in favor of a transition to renewable energy.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Rachel CombelicOtherIndividual
Rachel Combelic expresses frustration regarding the continued use of coal in the energy sector. However, the comment does not take a specific position on the proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Unmanaged Combustion Residual Leachate.
Read comment → - May 27, 2026Comment submitted by Debi CombsOpposeIndividual
Debi Combs, a private resident, opposes the proposed rule because she believes it weakens wastewater pollution standards and allows the coal industry to avoid cleaning up toxic combustion residual leachate. She argues that the rule will lead to increased drinking water contamination and disproportionately harm communities near coal-fired power plants.
Read comment → - May 21, 2026Comment submitted by Gail LandyOpposeIndividual
Gail Landy, a private resident, opposes the proposed rule because she believes it weakens wastewater pollution standards and allows the coal industry to avoid cleaning up toxic leachate. She argues that the EPA should withdraw the proposal and instead focus on retiring coal plants in favor of cleaner energy sources like solar and wind.
Read comment →
