1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-Benzopyran (HHCB); Phthalic Anhydride; o-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB); Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) Peer Review; Draft Risk Evaluations; Notice of SACC Meeting; Availability of Draft Documents and Request for Comment
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- 1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-Benzopyran (HHCB); Phthalic Anhydride; o-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) and p-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB); Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) Peer Review; Draft Risk Evaluations; Notice of SACC Meeting; Availability of Draft Documents and Request for Comment
Federal Register for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 (91 FR 19131) [FRL-13266-01-OCSPP]
- Posted
- Apr 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 14, 2026 – May 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07172
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Acute oral toxicity study selection | Hhcb risk evaluation scope | Inhalation toxicity methodology | Recaap framework usage | Uncertainty factors |
|---|
5 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by ToxStrategies, LLCOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Julie Panko, representing ToxStrategies LLC (funded by the American Chemistry Council’s Phthalic Anhydride TSCA Risk Evaluation Consortium), argues that the EPA's risk evaluation of Phthalic Anhydride overestimates worker exposure. She recommends that the EPA use more granular job titles to avoid misclassification, use task-level data rather than extrapolated 8-hour TWAs, and account for standard operating procedures regarding dermal PPE.
Read comment → - Jun 4, 2026Comment submitted by Integral Consulting Inc.OpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Integral Consulting, representing a chemical manufacturer's perspective, argues that the EPA's draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride overestimates occupational risks. The commenter suggests that the EPA relied on biased data sets, used inappropriate uncertainty factors, and failed to account for the chemical's rapid hydrolysis on the skin.
Read comment →
