Standards for Air Curtain Incinerators that Only Burn Wood Wastes, Yard Wastes and Clean Lumber; Provision for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Temporary Use Incinerators and Air Curtain Incinerators Used in Disaster Recovery

Zuz Cierzniak is a private individual who opposes the proposed rule because it loosens regulations on incineration practices and could lead to increased toxic emissions. The commenter argues that the proposal undermines environmental protections by exempting certain incinerators from CAA Title V and removing pyrolysis from the definition of Other Solid Waste Incinerators.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule change to exempt pyrolysis facilities from "solid waste incinerator" regulations under the Clean Air Act. They argue that pyrolysis facilities are essentially incinerators that release hazardous air pollutants and that exempting them would harm public health and allow the fossil fuel industry to continue plastic production.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule change to exempt pyrolysis facilities from "solid waste incinerator" regulations under the Clean Air Act. They argue that pyrolysis facilities are essentially incinerators that release hazardous air pollutants and that the exemption would harm public health and the environment while favoring the fossil fuel industry.

The commenter argues that pyrolysis facilities should not be exempted from "solid waste incinerator" status under the Clean Air Act because they release hazardous air pollutants and toxic fuel products. They contend that the proposed rule change would allow the fossil fuel industry to continue plastic production without adequate environmental oversight or health protections.

The commenter opposes the EPA's proposal to exempt pyrolysis facilities from "solid waste incinerator" regulations under the Clean Air Act. They argue that these facilities release hazardous air pollutants and that the exemption would allow the fossil fuel industry to continue plastic production without adequate oversight.

Evan Coleman opposes the proposed rule change to exempt pyrolysis facilities from "solid waste incinerator" classifications under the Clean Air Act. The commenter argues that pyrolysis facilities are essentially incinerators that release hazardous air pollutants and that exempting them would harm public health and the environment while benefiting the fossil fuel industry.