Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council; Notice of Meeting
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Federal Emergency Management Agency Review Council; Notice of Meeting
- Posted
- Apr 29, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 29, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08265
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Fema training and education | Implementation timeline | Parametric insurance | Refined risk reduction program (r3p) |
|---|
10 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 8, 2026Comment Submitted by LA County Office of Emergency ManagementSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Management provides feedback on the FEMA Review Council Final Report, advocating for reforms that recognize underinsurance and insurance delays as factors for federal assistance. The County supports expanding eligibility for underinsured survivors and opposes increasing the federal cost share for public assistance or raising the per capita disaster declaration threshold.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026Comment Submitted by Oregonians for Floodplain Protection (OFP)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Oregonians for Floodplain Protection, a coalition of local governments and stakeholders, supports the FEMA Review Council's recommendations to rescind Biological Opinions related to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and to exempt the NFIP from the Endangered Species Act (ESA). They argue that current ESA requirements impose unnecessary administrative burdens, undermine local land-use authority, and threaten public safety and access to flood insurance.
Read comment → - Jun 7, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousSupportOther📎 Attachment
The commenter proposes that FEMA should implement two policy enhancements: requiring independent damage verification for large Public Assistance projects and establishing a "Safe Harbor Provision" for insurance recovery efforts. They argue these changes will ensure that private insurance carriers fulfill their obligations before federal taxpayers are forced to cover costs, thereby protecting federal disaster assistance funds.
Read comment → - Jun 7, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousSupportOther
The commenter proposes a policy enhancement to FEMA to require independent damage verification for large public assistance claims and to establish a "Safe Harbor Provision" for insurance recovery efforts. They argue these changes will ensure FEMA remains the payer of last resort, prevent taxpayers from subsidizing insurance underpayments, and improve the stewardship of federal disaster funds.
Read comment →
