Transferring Machine Guns Between Qualified Licensees
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Transferring Machine Guns Between Qualified Licensees
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08928
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 479
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Interpretation of 27 cfr 479.105 | Simplify machine gun transfer procedures |
|---|---|---|
Main Street Foundation Center for Regulatory Analysis and Engagement AdvocacySupport The Main Street Foundation's Center for Regulatory Analysis and Engagement (CRAE) supports the proposed rule, arguing th | · | |
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. Trade associationSupport The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a trade association for the firearms industry, supports the ATF's propos | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 6, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
A factory authorized distributor for law enforcement and government entities supports simplifying the transfer of post-1986 dealer sample machine guns to facilitate lawful commerce. The commenter argues that current regulations hinder innovation, subcontracting, and inventory management, and proposes specific changes to improve the supply chain for government and law enforcement agencies.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividual
The commenter expresses mixed feelings, supporting the majority of the proposal for clarifying ambiguities while opposing specific provisions regarding the manufacture of post-86 "dealer's samples." They argue that the proposal could inadvertently stifle research and development by prohibiting the creation of inexpensive test articles for innovation purposes.
Read comment →
