Reforms to Remove SBA's 8(a) Program's Rebuttable Presumption of Social Disadvantage for Individually Owned Firms Only; Reforms Do Not Impact Entity-Owned Firms

Saundra Holloway, a resident of rural Arizona, opposes the proposed rule because it creates insurmountable administrative barriers for individual Indigenous and rural entrepreneurs by removing the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage. She argues that the change ignores systemic socio-economic challenges and undermines the SBA's core mission to level the economic playing field for marginalized individuals.

A U.S. Army veteran and small business owner opposes the proposed rule to eliminate the rebuttable presumption of social disadvantage for 8(a) applicants. The commenter argues that the rule is not truly race-neutral, as it ignores historical systemic discrimination and selectively exempts large entity-owned firms while creating significant barriers for individual applicants.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it creates an unworkable evidentiary burden by requiring applicants to identify specific formal policies or practices that caused material harm. They argue that discrimination is often informal and undocumented, and they instead propose a race-neutral standard based on credible sworn narratives of individual experiences.