Third-Party Servicing of Indirect Vehicle Loans
Proposed RuleNCUA-2026-0628-0001
Comments
19
Awaiting comments
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+95%
+95% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Third-Party Servicing of Indirect Vehicle Loans
- Posted
- Mar 25, 2026
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+95%
Net support
Support18Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +95% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Union
1
Business
4
Individual
1
Trade association
8
Advocacy
5
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Mar 25, 2026
Mar 30Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 18May 25
Support18Oppose0Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Business
100%
0%
0%
Union
100%
0%
0%
Individual
0%
0%
100%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
| Organization | regulatory burden reduction | regulatory relief for small credit unions |
|---|---|---|
California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues Trade associationSupport The California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues support the proposed repeal of regulations governing third-party servicin | · | |
Defense Credit Union Council AdvocacySupport The Defense Credit Union Council (DCUC) supports the NCUA's proposed rule to remove regulatory provisions regarding thir | · | |
NASCUS Trade associationSupport The National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors (NASCUS) supports the proposed rule to remove prescriptive co | · | |
National Automobile Dealers Association Trade associationSupport The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) supports the NCUA's proposed rule to remove rigid caps on the aggrega | · | |
Ohio Credit Union League Trade associationSupport The Ohio Credit Union League (OCUL) supports the NCUA's proposal to remove prescriptive regulations regarding third-part | · | |
The League of Credit Unions and Affiliates Trade associationSupport The League of Credit Unions & Affiliates supports the NCUA's proposal to rescind regulations regarding third-party servi | · | |
Utah Credit Union Association AdvocacySupport The Utah Credit Union Association supports the NCUA's proposed repeal of regulations governing third-party servicing of | · | |
Wisconsin Credit Union League AdvocacySupport The Wisconsin Credit Union League is writing in support of the NCUA's proposal to remove or revise regulatory limits on | · |
California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues
Trade associationSupport
regulatory burden reduction
Defense Credit Union Council
AdvocacySupport
regulatory burden reduction
NASCUS
Trade associationSupport
regulatory relief for small credit unions
National Automobile Dealers Association
Trade associationSupport
regulatory relief for small credit unions
Ohio Credit Union League
Trade associationSupport
regulatory burden reduction
The League of Credit Unions and Affiliates
Trade associationSupport
regulatory relief for small credit unions
Utah Credit Union Association
AdvocacySupport
regulatory burden reduction
Wisconsin Credit Union League
AdvocacySupport
regulatory relief for small credit unions
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
