Increasing the Fee for Certain Aliens Ordered Removed in Absentia as Established by the HR–1 Reconciliation Bill

RulemakingProposed RuleICEB-2026-0034-0001
🔔 Subscribe
Comments
0
Awaiting comments
Deadline
2 days
Closes Jun 23, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-33%
-33% excluding campaigns
Document

Details

The document's own metadata, straight from regulations.gov.

Posted
May 20, 2026
Comment period
May 20, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026
Agency
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICEB)
FR Doc
2026-10082
Analysis

Overview

No comments yet — comment period closing soon · 2 days left.

Comments

Explorer

Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.

2 comments from the past week

Comments older than a week are open to everyone. Read this week's arrivals — with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries — on the paid plan.

  • The commenter supports the proposed fee increase but argues that DHS must implement strict procedural safeguards to ensure fees are not imposed based on incorrect or inaccessible records. They request specific requirements for case-specific notice, administrative record preservation, a meaningful dispute process, and the maintenance of aggregate audit data.

© 2026 Government Context · not affiliated with any U.S. government agencyPrivacyTermsDockets