Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 27, 2026KillChain, Inc. (d/b/a FLINT Network)SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
KillChain, Inc. (d/b/a FLINT Network), a technology provider for AI agent identity and fraud protection, supports the proposed risk-based, technology-neutral CIP framework for stablecoin issuers. They argue that the final rule should explicitly recognize verifiable credentials and signed verification records as valid non-documentary verification methods, particularly to address the unique challenges of non-human agents exercising delegated financial authority.
Read comment → - Jun 25, 2026VeloxVFX LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
VeloxVFX LLC, a company providing architecture-oriented concepts, supports the proposed rule but argues that Customer Identification Program (CIP) obligations should be tied to specific, defined customer-relationship states rather than mere possession of a stablecoin or secondary-market activity. They advocate for a "lifecycle-separated" framework to improve supervisory readability, preserve institutional boundaries, and clarify responsibilities between issuers and intermediaries.
Read comment →
