Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Rio Grande LNG Train 6, LLC
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Rio Grande LNG Train 6, LLC
- Posted
- Aug 3, 2026
- Comment period
- Aug 3, 2026 – ?
- FR Doc
- 2026-15695
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 30, 2026South Texas Environmental Justice NetworkOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Earthjustice, acting as counsel for the South Texas Environmental Justice Network, Border Workers United, Sierra Club, Carrizo-Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, and the City of Port Isabel, opposes the Rio Grande LNG Train 6 expansion. They argue the project is contrary to the public interest due to environmental impacts, climate change concerns, and potential harm to local communities and wildlife.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026J ManciasOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Juan B Mancias, a private individual, opposes the Rio Grande LNG Train 6 expansion, arguing that the project is premature, environmentally destructive, and violates the rights of the Esto’k Gna, Carrizo Comecrudo Tribal Nation. The commenter highlights concerns regarding the mishandling of ancestral remains, lack of indigenous consent, and the project's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Read comment →