Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date: PJM Interconnection, LLC, AEP Appalachian Transmission Co., Inc., AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Co., et al.
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date: PJM Interconnection, LLC, AEP Appalachian Transmission Co., Inc., AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Co., et al.
- Posted
- Jun 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 24, 2026 – ?
- FR Doc
- 2026-12708
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 15, 2026Relentless Energy Systems LLCAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 8, 2026MAVEN SOLUTIONSSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Maven Solutions, a decision-intelligence practice, argues that PJM's current tariff posture on large-load interconnection is inadequate regarding ratepayer protection and financial surety. They recommend that the Commission require PJM to submit specific tariff revisions to improve transparency, cost-causation methodologies, and reliability-hold-harmless mechanisms.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026MAVEN SOLUTIONSSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Maven Solutions, a decision-intelligence practice, argues that PJM's current tariff posture on large-load interconnection is inadequate regarding ratepayer protection and financial surety. They recommend that the Commission require PJM to submit specific tariff revisions to improve transparency, cost-causation methodologies, and reliability-hold-harmless mechanisms.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Global Capacity AllianceSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Global Capacity Alliance (GCA), a nonprofit association, requests to intervene in the proceedings and urges the Commission to incorporate "Front-of-the-Meter (FTM) Netting" frameworks into RTO/ISO compliance strategies. They argue that FTM-Netting allows large loads (like data centers) to privately fund and manage capacity while maintaining grid visibility and reliability.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026L MeltonSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Lisa Melton, filing as L.M. Marlowe, is a private citizen and independent researcher who supports the Commission's Show Cause Orders by providing technical specifications for grid reliability. She argues for a "Frequency-Response Absorption Standard" and a "Coupling-Discrimination Protocol" to ensure that large-load integration does not compromise system stability or unfairly shift costs to ratepayers.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026E PierceSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
New Era Energy & Digital Inc., a data center developer, supports the Commission's action to reform PJM's tariff rules regarding large loads. They argue that PJM should adopt a "Maximum Net Withdrawal" framework for co-located generation and include fast-track processes for safe supply additions like uprates and reactivations in its resource-adequacy report.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026L MeltonSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Lisa Melton, an independent researcher and private citizen, supports the Commission's efforts to address the reliability and cost-allocation challenges posed by large computational loads. She proposes a specific "boundary-verification" framework to ensure grid stability and cost-causation without requiring access to proprietary internal data.
Read comment →
