Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
- Posted
- Mar 26, 2013
- Comment period
- Mar 26, 2013 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Apr 8, 2026Comment from Mark GieseSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 25, 2025Comment from Jeffrey AkardSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 25, 2025Comment from Mark M GieseSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 25, 2025Comment from Howard CohenSupportIndividual
The commenter, identifying as a physicist and concerned grandparent, urges the FDA to monitor all imported foodstuffs and lower the allowable limits for radioactive Cesium-137 to match or exceed Japanese standards. They argue that these measures are necessary to protect public health from serious illnesses caused by radiation.
Read comment → - Nov 25, 2025Comment from Peggy DetmersOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 19, 2025Comment from Romi ElnagarSupportIndividual
The commenter, a private individual from Louisiana, supports the petition to regulate harmful substances in seafood. They argue that there is no safe level of radioactivity and that the government must ensure consumers are not ingesting dangerous isotopes from the Fukushima disaster.
Read comment → - Oct 18, 2025Comment from Mark GieseSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 17, 2025Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to lower the FDA's admissible levels of cesium-134 and cesium-137 in food. They argue that current levels are unsafe due to bioaccumulation and the increasing risk of radioactive contamination from Japanese exports and nuclear expansion.
Read comment → - Mar 13, 2025Comment from Bill SmirnowSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed action to lower acceptable radiation levels in the US food supply, arguing that current limits are far too high and pose a significant health risk to the public. They advocate for a policy that aligns more closely with Japanese standards to protect against cellular mutagenosis.
Read comment → - Mar 12, 2025Comment from SHERYL SENKIWSupportIndividualRead comment →
