Gov Contract Pros
BusinessSupport
extension of comment period
FAR-2026-0001-0001
Comments
23
Last activity Jun 26, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+52%
+52% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+52%
Net support
Support17Oppose5Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +52% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
10
Individual
7
Trade association
3
Advocacy
1
Other
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6
Support17Oppose5Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Business
70%
30%
0%
Individual
57%
29%
14%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Other
100%
0%
0%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
3 organizations filed this week — visible to subscribers.
| Organization | extension of comment period |
|---|---|
Gov Contract Pros BusinessSupport GovContractPros, LLC, a government contracting services firm, requests that the FAR Council extend the public comment pe | |
Sintavia, LLC BusinessSupport Sintavia, LLC, a defense subcontractor, supports the FAR Council's effort to standardize CUI requirements but argues tha | · |
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce is requesting an extension of the public comment period for four propose | |
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce BusinessSupport The U.S. |
Sintavia, LLC
BusinessSupport
mandatory sf xxx flowdown
The American Small Business Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
extension of comment period
U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce
BusinessSupport
extension of comment period
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- 1 comment from the past week
One comment matches your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jun 24, 2026Sintavia, LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Sintavia, LLC, a defense subcontractor, supports the FAR Council's effort to standardize CUI requirements but argues that the proposed rule should be revised to make the flowdown of Standard Form XXX (SF XXX) mandatory rather than discretionary. They contend that making it mandatory ensures subcontractors receive the necessary information to identify CUI categories, apply correct safeguarding controls, and meet incident reporting deadlines.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Shawn BilakSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Shawn Bilak of Bilak Security Solutions, LLC, expresses support for the FAR Council's efforts to simplify and standardize acquisition requirements, particularly regarding the proposed CUI framework and the creation of Standard Form XXX. The commenter provides specific recommendations to ensure the new rules provide clear, contract-specific guidance on CUI identification, incident reporting timelines, cloud service usage, and subcontractor flowdowns to improve contractor compliance and assessment readiness.
Read comment →