Airport Improvement Program Handbook
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Airport Improvement Program Handbook
- Posted
- May 19, 2026
- Comment period
- May 19, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09971
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 10, 2026Essential Aero, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Essential Aero, Inc., a U.S. manufacturer of autonomous airfield safety equipment, supports the Draft Order's recognition of FOD removal equipment as eligible airfield safety equipment. They request specific clarifications to ensure that self-propelled autonomous systems and airport-owned autonomous ground vehicles qualify for funding and equipment standards.
Read comment → - Jun 11, 2026Thibaut GiretSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Thibaut Giret, a legal practitioner in the airport infrastructure industry, argues that the draft order creates compliance uncertainty for design-build projects due to structural conflicts with Buy American requirements and lacks clear definitions for "unique complexities." He proposes amending the order to include a staged certification mechanism and a non-exhaustive list of factors to better accommodate airport technology and systems programs.
Read comment → - May 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues that the Legacy Crosswind section in Appendix B, Table B-3.3 of the Airport Improvement Program Handbook is overly burdensome and exceeds the scope of 49 USC 47102(V). They specifically point out several requirements in the table that are either not in the regulation or directly conflict with existing regulatory language regarding wind coverage.
Read comment →
