Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List - Draft; Notice of Availability
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List - Draft; Notice of Availability
Federal Register for Monday, April 6, 2026 (91 FR 17186) [FRL-10773-01-OW]
- Posted
- Apr 6, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 6, 2026 – Jun 6, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-06662
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Add chemicals to monitoring list | Add mycobacteria to ccl | Add mycobacterium to list | Ban from water supply | Carcinogenic risk of non-mcl dbps |
|---|
35 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 8, 2026Comment submitted by International Bottled Water Association (IBWA)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) supports the EPA's inclusion of PFAS and microplastics on the Draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6). They advocate for a science-based approach that prioritizes the development of standardized testing methodologies, clear definitions, and collaborative research with the Department of Health and Human Services.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Kimi WeiSupportIndividual
An individual commenter argues that microplastics are severe environmental contaminants that should be added to the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List. They emphasize the pervasive nature of microplastics in the food chain and human bodies, advocating for a reduction in plastic manufacturing and disposal.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by E. R. (no surname provided)SupportIndividual
An individual is urging the EPA to include glyphosate on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List. They argue that glyphosate may harm the human microbiome and endangered species by reducing beneficial bacteria like *L. reuteri*, which is linked to immune health.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Rachel ElkinsSupportIndividual
Rachel Elkins requests that the agency include mycobacteria on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List. She argues that current water treatments do not kill these bacteria and that they pose a significant health risk to susceptible individuals.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by The Tennessee Center for Bioethics & CultureSupportAdvocacy
The Tennessee Center for Bioethics & Culture urges the EPA to include mifepristone on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List. They argue that because mifepristone is an endocrine disruptor, it is essential to include it in the screening program to protect public health and the environment.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Lana HambySupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Diane CressSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Tricia MershonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentSupportIndividual
An individual living with MAC lung disease argues that the bacteria should be added to the Drinking Water Contaminant List. They express concern that the bacteria enter the water supply through domestic waste and believe that regulation could significantly reduce new infections and save lives.
Read comment →
