Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
| Organization |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 11, 1999Comment submitted by Sarah P. Faulconer [W-98-32-I-B2-78]SupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Sarah P. Falconer expresses support for stricter protections for endangered species by urging the EPA to require site-specific conservation strategies to prevent incidental killings. She also advocates for the consideration of cumulative impacts on species when consulting on permits or water quality programs.
Read comment → - May 5, 1999Comment submitted by Raymond Rau [W-98-32-I-B2-52]SupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Raymond Rau, a private individual, is requesting that the proposed Memorandum of Agreement be strengthened to provide greater protections for endangered species. He suggests specific requirements for site plans, objections to permits affecting listed species, and the consideration of cumulative effects.
Read comment → - Apr 12, 1999Comment submitted by William Nichols [W-98-32-I-B1-214]SupportIndividual📎 Attachment
William Nichols, a private citizen, urges the EPA to revise the proposed Memorandum of Agreement to include stricter protections for endangered species. He argues that the agreement should prohibit incidental killings without site-specific conservation strategies and require the EPA to consider cumulative impacts on wildlife.
Read comment →