Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Harmonization with consent order |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by James ScarboroughSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the EPA's use of the TSCA significant-new-use mechanism to maintain oversight of activities that do not conform to existing TSCA Orders. They request that the EPA improve the public record by adding a nonconfidential, substance-by-substance implementation appendix and providing clearer assumptions behind the SNUN and export-notification burden estimates.
Read comment → - Jun 26, 2026Comment submitted by Onium PAG ConsortiumOtherBusiness📎 Attachment
Lawrence E. Culleen, representing the Semiconductor Photoacid Generator (PAG) Consortium, requests that the EPA harmonize the language of the proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) with the terms of a predicate Consent Order. He also identifies a typographical error in the PMN number cited in the Supplementary Information for one of the substances.
Read comment →