Virginia: Approval of State Coal Combustion Residuals Permit Program

The commenter expresses concerns regarding the long-term environmental risks of coal ash, specifically highlighting groundwater contamination and the need for strong oversight, transparency, and tribal consultation. Rather than explicitly supporting or opposing the approval of the Virginia permit program, the commenter requests that the EPA ensure any approved program includes rigorous protections and accountability.

The commenter supports the approval of Virginia's partial Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) permit program, arguing that the state's specific regulations provide sufficient accountability and environmental protection. They suggest that the program balances energy needs with public health and economic benefits, such as protecting the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and supporting tourism and fishing industries.

The commenter supports Virginia's State Coal Combustion Residuals Permit Program but argues that the current language is insufficiently specific and could create jurisdictional gaps. They recommend that the EPA provide clearer guidance to facilities, define the specific boundaries of the "partial" approval between the EPA and VADEQ, and provide a geographical map of the respective jurisdictions.

A private resident who lives near a past coal ash spill site opposes the proposed permit program. The commenter argues that shifting oversight to the state level constitutes a dangerous deregulation that will reduce monitoring, increase health risks, and make federal enforcement more difficult.