Draft Integrated Science Assessment to Support the Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Draft Integrated Science Assessment to Support the Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen
Federal Register for Friday, July 17, 2026 (91 FR 44841) (FRL-11157-04-OAR)
- Posted
- Jul 17, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 17, 2026 – Sep 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-14459
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Chris Frey (Part 3 of 3)OtherIndividual📎 Attachment
H. Christopher Frey is submitting a continuation of supporting references for his previous comments regarding the Draft Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen. The submission includes a statement regarding oversized EPA documents and provides a memorandum from the EPA Science Advisory Board regarding the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Chris Frey (Part 1 of 3)OtherIndividual📎 Attachment
H. Christopher Frey, a former EPA official and CASAC chair, is commenting on the scientific review process for the NO2 NAAQS. He argues that the EPA has failed to explain the apparent disbanding of the multidisciplinary NO2 Review Panel, which the agency previously determined was necessary for a comprehensive review.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment submitted by Chris Frey (Part 2 of 3)OtherOther📎 Attachment
The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) submitted a report regarding the EPA's process for appointing members to federal advisory committees. The report identifies deficiencies in the appointment process, including a lack of documented staff rationales and issues with ethics oversight for special government employees.
Read comment →