Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 1, 2026Anonymous public commentSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that the EPA should add congressionally directed projects to the list of categorical exclusions that do not require documentation. They contend that because Congress has specifically identified and funded these projects, the EPA should not impose additional NEPA reviews, which they view as bureaucratic delays.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by JCarpenter Law OfficeOpposeBusiness
Jamie Carpenter, an environmental attorney at JCARPENTER LAW OFFICES PLLC, opposes the EPA's proposed updates to NEPA procedures. The commenter argues that the proposal weakens environmental oversight, compromises review quality by prioritizing speed over science, and marginalizes frontline communities by shortening public participation windows.
Read comment →