Town Hall Meetings To Provide Input on Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) Rulemaking
Proposed RuleCISA-2022-0010-0480
Comments
23
Awaiting comments
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+39%
+39% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Town Hall Meetings To Provide Input on Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) Rulemaking
- Posted
- May 26, 2026
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+39%
Net support
Support15Oppose6Other2
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +39% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Academic
1
Business
6
Individual
1
Government
1
Advocacy
1
Trade association
13
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 26, 2026
Jul 13
Support15Oppose6Other2
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Trade association
62%
38%
0%
Business
67%
17%
17%
Academic
100%
0%
0%
Individual
100%
0%
0%
Government
0%
0%
100%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Substantial cyber incident definition8
Reporting burden on small businesses2
Chemical sector applicability criteria1
Conflicting reporting requirements1
Impact on insurance coverage1
Isac integration and reporting1
Ot cyber incident identification1
Physical layer security and reporting1
Reporting process usability1
Sector-specific applicability criteria1
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- 1 comment from the past week
One comment matches your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.