Greiner PURtec - Exemption/Rulemaking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Greiner PURtec - Exemption/Rulemaking
Petition of Greiner PURtec for an exemption to 14 CFR 25.853(a) & 21.601(b)(2).
- Posted
- Feb 19, 2008
- Comment period
- Feb 19, 2008 – Feb 20, 2099
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Dec 22, 2025Jane wattOpposeOther
The commenter argues that the FAA should deny Greiner PURtec's request for an exemption because the proposed water-based adhesive fails to meet vertical burn requirements. They express concern that granting the exemption would compromise aviation safety and set a dangerous precedent for future aircraft interior components.
Read comment → - Dec 15, 2025Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports Greiner PURtec's petition for an exemption from vertical burn requirements for cushion assemblies. They argue that the exemption is necessary to prevent financial hardship during a transition to water-based adhesives and that the safety of the flying public is not compromised.
Read comment → - May 28, 2022Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividualRead comment →
