Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (26-2)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (26-2)
Federal Register for Friday, April 24, 2026 (91 FR 22075) [FRL-13085-01-OCSPP]
- Posted
- Apr 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 24, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08012
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 721
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 15, 2026Comment submitted by Alliance for Automotive InnovationOtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation is requesting a 30-day extension of the comment period for the proposed Significant New Use Rules on certain mixed metal oxides. They argue that the complexity of the rules and their significant impact on the battery and electric vehicle supply chain require more time for stakeholders to provide a technically informed and data-driven public record.
Read comment → - May 11, 2026Comment submitted by Chemical Users Coalition (CUC)OtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Chemical Users Coalition (CUC), representing various industrial and technology companies, is requesting a 30-day extension of the comment period for the proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs). They argue that more time is needed for members to identify all relevant aspects of the rules and to ensure the EPA receives a well-balanced collection of comments.
Read comment → - May 6, 2026Comment submitted by Natalia CardonaSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Natalia Cardona expresses support for the proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) because they provide a necessary safety procedure to protect workers and the environment. She argues that the rule closes potential loopholes and ensures that all companies are held to the same safety standards by requiring EPA evaluation before any significant new use of chemicals occurs.
Read comment → - May 5, 2026Comment submitted by Ultium Cells, LLC and General Motors LLCOtherBusiness📎 Attachment
Ultium Cells, LLC and General Motors LLC are requesting a 30-day extension to the comment period for the proposed SNUR. They argue that the current timeframe is insufficient for stakeholders to review complex new policy documents and to accurately assess the full scope of the rule's economic impacts on the battery supply chain.
Read comment →
