fcc_ecfs:FCC-2026-2905-0001:26110061099
Andrew GrimmOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter, a drone hobbyist, opposes the proposed ban on importing and marketing certain UAS and components. They argue that broad restrictions would unfairly impact recreational users, reduce consumer choice, and stifle innovation, suggesting that security concerns should be addressed through targeted regulations instead.
I am a pilot and drone hobbyist.
I support allowing hobbyist drones to continue being imported and sold in the United States. Recreational drone flying is an educational, creative, and family-friendly hobby enjoyed by thousands of Americans. Hobbyists use drones for photography, videography, learning about aviation, STEM education, search-and-rescue volunteer support, and responsible recreational flying under existing FAA rules.
Restricting access to consumer drones would primarily affect law-abiding hobbyists rather than addressing legitimate national security concerns. Consumers benefit from competition, innovation, and affordable choices in the marketplace. Limiting imports would reduce those choices, increase prices, and slow technological innovation.
If there are genuine security concerns involving data privacy or government use of specific products, those issues should be addressed through targeted, evidence-based regulations rather than broad restrictions that negatively impact responsible recreational users. Many hobbyists operate their drones completely offline or take appropriate steps to protect their privacy.
I encourage the FCC to consider the significant educational, economic, and recreational benefits that consumer drones provide and to avoid policies that unnecessarily restrict access for responsible hobbyists. Please preserve the ability of Americans to purchase and enjoy consumer drones while addressing any legitimate security concerns through narrowly tailored measures.