Comment from Anonymous
Anonymous AnonymousOpposeAdvocacy
Summary: The executive director of a scientific scholarly society opposes the proposed revisions to 2 CFR § 200.205, arguing that they would subordinate scientific merit review to political and policy review by senior appointees. The commenter argues that this change would undermine the reliability of federal research grantmaking, damage curiosity-driven science, and increase administrative burdens.
See attached file(s)