Comment from Charles Froelich

Charles FroelichOpposeUnion
Summary: The National Education Association opposes the proposed rule on federal financial assistance, arguing that it grants political appointees too much influence over funding decisions. They contend that the rule creates uncertainty for schools and educators, potentially jeopardizing critical programs for student mental health, literacy, and teacher training.
I urge OMB to withdraw its proposed rule on federal financial assistance. This proposal would give political appointees greater influence over decisions about which schools, colleges, and community organizations receive federal funding. Funding decisions should be based on student needs, program quality, and professional expertise, NOT political ideology. This rule could create uncertainty for programs that students and educators rely on every day, including efforts to recruit and train educators, school mental health services, literacy programs, and other critical supports. At a time when schools are facing educator shortages, student mental health challenges, and ongoing learning needs, we should strengthen federal investments, NOT put them at risk. The proposal will create a chilling effect on schools and educators by making them guess whether changing political priorities could jeopardize funding. Educators should be free to support every student and create safe, welcoming learning environments without fear that critical resources could be taken away. Educators need stability so they can focus on teaching and supporting students, NOT navigating politically motivated requirements. Students deserve stable access to the programs and services that help them learn and thrive. Federal funding should serve students, not politics. I urge OMB to withdraw this proposal and preserve a fair, transparent, and student-centered grant system. (Message sent under the aegis of the National Education Association)

View on Regulations.gov