Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Douglas Natelson
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: A condensed matter physicist opposes the proposed transition to the new draft GFA, arguing that it is premature to link NSF rules to pending OMB revisions that are subject to litigation. The commenter also highlights concerns regarding the lack of clear termination criteria, the creation of an unfunded mandate for publication costs, and the inclusion of vague executive orders.
See attached file(s)