Comment Submitted by Nevada Legal Services
AnonymousOpposeAdvocacy
Summary: Nevada Legal Services, Inc., a state-based legal services provider, opposes the proposed rule because it removes protections against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. They argue the rule would violate state laws, conflict with Supreme Court precedents like Bostock v. Clayton County, and potentially expose housing providers to legal liability and criminal acts.
Please see the attached letter entitled Re: Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Revisions. This letter represents the public comment on No. FR-6518-P-01 from Nevada Legal Services. The letter details how the proposed rule will impact individuals specifically in the state of Nevada and opposes the proposed rule.