Comment on FR Doc # 2026-13281
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: A recreational user of national forests opposes the proposal to narrow the public's right to comment on Forest Service directives. The commenter argues that public participation is essential for accountability and that changes to the Handbooks, which govern land management, should remain subject to public notice and comment.
I’m writing to oppose this proposal to narrow the public’s right to comment on Forest Service directives. I hike, and camp, look for rocks, read, cook my meals, identify flowers and birds, on national forest land, and the decisions buried in these rulebooks shape every acre of it. Being from Michigan I frequent more of our national forests than I can name; I think that the Manistee National Forest is one of the most beautiful places I have ever been and somewhere that should be treasured.
In 2018, the Forest Service concluded that its Handbooks contain standards and guidelines that directly affect the public, and it expanded public comment to cover them. That conclusion was correct. The Handbooks govern grazing permits, timber sale analysis, land management planning, and special-use decisions that shape these lands for everyone who depends on them. Changes to those guides deserve more public notice and comment, not less.
Public participation is how management of 193 million acres of public land stays accountable to the people who own it. That accountability is worth protecting. I urge the Forest Service to withdraw this proposal and preserve the public’s right to comment on directive changes, whether they appear in the Manual or the Handbooks.