Comment from Karen Dalton

AnonymousOpposeAdvocacy
Summary: The Catholic Medical Association (CMA) opposes the proposed action, arguing that it expands access to chemical abortions which they believe are ethically wrong and medically risky. They advocate for stricter regulations, including mandatory in-person physician consultations, comprehensive informed consent regarding risks and alternatives, and reporting of all adverse effects.
This is the reality of what many of us who are trying to care for affected women are seeing: In places where it is now illegal for abortions after 6 weeks gestation, one thing providers have seen is that women are offered medical abortions by abortion clinics prior to 6 weeks, and then women return there 1 week after taking both mifepristone and misoprostol for followup sonograms. If sono still shows signs of IUP and patient is beyond 6 weeks, patients are being referred out of state, usually to New York for followup surgical abortion. The women go home to think about this and then start reaching out for help sometimes at local pregnancy centers to see if their baby is still alive, as they may be told that the medical abortion procedure failed but are not shown results of the sonogram and do not know what that really means. They may have had bleeding and thought that the procedure was successful. so they now have even less trust in the care at the abortion clinic and may not want to go back and don't want to travel out of state. One of many issues here is that when these women are in this place of uncertainty, they also need ongoing medical care and are risk of complications such as infection, bleeding and death. They may not have health insurance or money to pay for a sonogram at a radiology facility. They may be less than 21 years old with no support system. If women obtain their prescriptions online, they don't even have any provider other than the emergency room for follow up care and may not again get appropriate care for incomplete abortions, secondary infections (which occur in 10% of cases), etc. These statistics worsen the further along in a pregnancy these patients are. This is NOT adequate health care. The answer is NOT to further expand access and eliminate any restrictions, as even more frightened women will be injured with nowhere to turn but a busy emergency room.

View on Regulations.gov