Comment submitted by Patricia Kepenash
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: A resident of Nantucket Island opposes the rescission of PFAS regulatory determinations, citing local water contamination from fire retardants at a nearby airport. The commenter argues that diligent testing and notification of PFAS levels must continue to protect their island's sole aquifer.
I am deeply concerned about this change and or rescission of reg ulatory determinations and removal of any provisitions on PFAS. I live on Nantucket Island, which has a sole sourse aquifer (NOT OTHER SOURCE! Get it!) Our water has been tainted with PFAS from use of fire retardents in training at our airport. WE have had to shut down one of only 7 wells already. Testing and vigiliant testing and notification of all levels of PFAS should be continued diligently to protect our sole watersource. Sincerely,