EBSA-2026-0232-0001, St Gianna Center for Women’s Health & FertilityCare

St Gianna Center for Women’s Health & FertilityCareSupportAdvocacy
Summary: The Executive Director of St Gianna Center for Women's Health & FertilityCare advocates for funding to be directed toward Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) and NaProTechnology. The commenter argues that these methods address the root causes of infertility more effectively and safely than IVF and other artificial reproductive technologies.
As Executive Director of St Gianna Center for Women’s Health & FertilityCare, I would like to express my concern regarding funding of fertility services. For the last 16 years, our organization has helped over 1200 patients understand & chart their fertility. In 2025, over 60% of our clients came to us experiencing “unexplained infertility “. But by using Creighton Model FertilityCare Charting, we are experiencing a 40% success rate in our clients achieving pregnancy, just by understanding their fertile window & using days of fertility to achieve pregnancy. And when our clients work in coordination with a doctor practicing Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM), specifically NaProTecnology, we have an 80% success rate. RRM & NaPro get to the root cause of infertility. And often when that root cause is identified, women not only can achieve a healthy successful pregnancy, but their overall quality of life improves. Often, issues such as endometriosis & dysmenorrhea are resolved, leading to better quality of life. I respectfully ask that further funding go towards medical care that is Restorative. Alternatively, IVF & ART, Artificial Reroductive Technology do not get to the root cause of infertility Though a healthy baby may be the outcome, 6-8 babies are lost in the process & the mother still suffers from undiagnosed & untreated conditions. This is a tragedy. I respectfully request more funding to be directed to RRM and NaProTecnology.

View on Regulations.gov