Lieb, David--IMPACT
Private Physician-CardiologistOpposeIndividual
Summary: A cardiologist is opposing a proposed reimbursement cut for office-based cardiac ultrasound examinations. The commenter argues that the reduction will make the service unsustainable for private practices and will negatively impact the availability of these vital diagnostic tests for Medicare beneficiaries.
I am writing in response to your recent proposal which will result in, by the
calculation of our professional associations, a 42% drop in reimbursement for
office-based cardiac ultrasound examinations. Cardiac ultrasound has become a
vital part of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with cardiac and
potentially cardiac disease entities. The examination is required by numerous
professional guidelines and quality initiatives, often with government
endorsement. I perform this procedure as a noninvasive cardiologist in my office
and I interpret these studies for a local community hospital and a major academic
medical center. I am a former medical director of an academic cardiac ultrasound
department. I know the cost entailed in providing this service. In no uncertain
terms, I will be unable to continue this part of my practice and I forsee significant
changes in the availability of this service to Medicare beneficiaries if these cuts
are allowed. The reimbursement for these services has continually declined over
the past 10 years. To proceed further at this rate is irresponsible and will have
grave consequences.