Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08930

To Whom It May Concern: I support the proposed rulemaking to remove the factoring criteria related to firearms equipped with stabilizing braces and to restore the regulatory definitions to align with the statutory language enacted by Congress. The 2023 final rule created significant uncertainty for lawful firearm owners, manufacturers, retailers, and disabled individuals who rely on stabilizing braces for safe and practical firearm operation. Multiple federal courts found substantial legal and procedural issues with the prior rule, including concerns regarding consistency with the Administrative Procedure Act and the agency’s statutory authority. The resulting injunctions and vacaturs demonstrate the importance of clear, predictable, and legally grounded regulations. The proposed rule appropriately recognizes that the prior factoring criteria introduced subjective and inconsistent standards that made compliance difficult for ordinary citizens acting in good faith. Restoring objective definitions that track the underlying statutes will improve regulatory clarity, promote uniform enforcement, and reduce confusion among lawful gun owners and industry participants. In addition, stabilizing braces have been widely owned and used for years for legitimate lawful purposes, including recreational shooting, self-defense, and assisting individuals with physical limitations. Regulations affecting commonly owned firearm accessories should be based on clear statutory authority rather than shifting interpretive standards. I encourage ATF to finalize this rule and ensure future regulatory actions remain closely tied to the text enacted by Congress, while providing transparent guidance and consistency for the public. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.