Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08930

I respectfully support the proposed removal of the factoring criteria for firearms equipped with stabilizing braces. The prior brace rule created substantial confusion and uncertainty for millions of law-abiding firearm owners, retailers, manufacturers, and Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). The factoring criteria relied heavily on subjective interpretations involving weight, length, optics, accessories, marketing materials, and perceived intent. This made compliance difficult for ordinary citizens attempting in good faith to follow federal law. The repeal of these criteria is appropriate and consistent with multiple federal court decisions that found serious legal and procedural flaws with the prior rulemaking. Removing the factoring criteria will help restore regulatory clarity and public confidence. However, I strongly encourage ATF to go further by adopting clear safe-harbor protections for stabilizing brace owners and manufacturers. Law-abiding citizens should not remain vulnerable to future shifting interpretations or case-by-case determinations based on vague or subjective standards. Specifically, the final rule should include language clarifying that: - The possession or use of a stabilizing brace alone does not automatically indicate intent to create a short-barreled rifle. - Firearms equipped with commercially manufactured stabilizing braces that were lawfully sold and possessed should be presumed compliant absent clear criminal intent. - Objective and easily understandable standards should replace subjective evaluations based on appearance, accessories, marketing language, or perceived use. - ATF should not pursue retroactive enforcement actions against individuals who purchased brace-equipped firearms in reliance on prior classifications or widespread commercial availability. In addition, the final rule should recognize the legitimate use of stabilizing braces by disabled individuals, injured veterans, and other firearm owners who use such devices for enhanced control and safe operation. Clear, objective, and stable regulations are essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that citizens can comply with the law without fear that lawful conduct may later be reinterpreted through changing administrative opinions. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed rule.