Comment on FR Doc # 2026-01141
Nathan MooreSupportIndividual
Summary: A disabled veteran supports the proposed revision to the definition of an "unlawful user of or addicted to controlled substances." The commenter argues that the current definition creates inconsistent standards due to state-level marijuana legalization and that refining it would protect the Second Amendment rights of individuals seeking non-pharmaceutical pain management.
Subject: Public Comment on Proposed Rule 2025R-54T
The U.S. Constitution and various state constitutions guarantee the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense and the defense of the nation. The Founding Fathers viewed this as an inherent right that "shall not be infringed." While public safety is a paramount concern, it must be balanced so as not to supersede fundamental individual liberties.
Many individuals previously prohibited from firearm ownership due to substance use have made positive life changes and should not be permanently barred from their rights. Currently, the discrepancy between federal and state marijuana regulations creates an inconsistent and confusing standard. With over 80% of states legalizing marijuana in some form and 50% legalizing it recreationally, the current "user" definitions create contradictory legal situations.
Refining the definition of a "controlled substance user" would reduce the burden on law-abiding citizens. Specifically, as a disabled veteran, I believe that providing access to non-pharmaceutical pain management without sacrificing Second Amendment rights is a necessary and significant improvement.