Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08918

Danny CollinsSupportIndividual
Summary: A North Carolina concealed handgun permit holder supports the proposed rule to recognize qualifying state permits as valid Brady Act substitutes. The commenter argues that redundant NICS checks are unnecessary for individuals who have already undergone rigorous state-level vetting.
I am a North Carolina Concealed Handgun Permit holder writing in strong support of this proposed rule. My CHP required a thorough FBI fingerprint check and disqualifier review — a more rigorous process than a standard NICS check. Being required to submit to a redundant NICS check at every firearm purchase treats me as a suspect despite having already been thoroughly vetted. I urge ATF to finalize this rule and recognize qualifying state permits as valid Brady Act substitutes. I've had my concealed carry permit for over 10 years.

View on Regulations.gov