Comment on FR Doc # 2026-08918
Greg DobbsSupportIndividual
Summary: The commenter supports the proposed rule, stating that law-abiding permit holders and FFLs benefit from clear and consistent regulations. They argue that states should have a clear path to use existing background checks as a Brady Act alternative when statutory requirements are met.
I support the general purpose of the proposed rule. Law-abiding permit holders and Federal Firearms Licensees (“FFLs”) benefit from clear, consistent, and administrable rules. When a state has already conducted a sufficient background check before issuing a firearms-related permit, there should be a clear path for that permit to serve as a Brady Act alternative, provided the statutory requirements are met.